tariffs

On February 20, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the use of tariffs, invalidating certain tariffs imposed by the Trump Administration under the statute.SEMI shared the following statement on the ruling: SEMI acknowledges today’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding the use of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. As the implications of the decision become clearer, we welcome further guidance and remain committed to working with the U.S. government to strengthen semiconductor supply chains, support innovation, and expand domestic chip manufacturing.Continued investment in U.S. manufacturing depends on stable, reliable access to the highly specialized equipment, materials, and components essential to semiconductor production. Driven by global demand, breakthrough innovation, and record levels of investment, the semiconductor industry is projected to reach a $1 trillion market this year. Clear, consistent, and predictable trade policy remains critical to providing manufacturers – particularly small- and medium-sized enterprises – the certainty necessary to sustain long term investment, scale production, and reinforce technological leadership in the United States.Visit SEMI Global Advocacy to learn more about public policy efforts and developments as well as how your company or organization can get involved.Royal Kastens is Vice President, Global Public Policy Advocacy at SEMI.

On July 7, President Trump issued an executive order (EO) extending the ten percent baseline tariff rate through August 1, 2025. In addition, the EO suspends the variable "reciprocal" tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) until August 1. The order applies to nearly all countries except Mexico, Canada, and China. These changes do not impact separate reciprocal tariff actions on China or alter existing Section 232 measures on steel, aluminum, autos, and their derivative products. At the time of this posting, letters had been sent to 20 trading partners outlining expected tariff rates if no agreement is reached by August 1; bilateral negotiations are ongoing. Eleven of the 21 countries received rate cuts compared to the "Liberation Day" announcements on April 2, ranging from one to 13 percent. President Trump indicated rates could rise around 25 percent if trading partners retaliate. Next Steps: The extension offers short-term stability for SEMI member companies to assess supply chain exposure. SEMI continues to monitor bilateral trade and tariff policy negotiations, including for discussion related to the semiconductor supply chain. We aim to keep member companies informed of relevant tariff escalations. If your company is directly impacted by a country-specific rate shift, please reach out to your region’s SEMI Global Advocacy contact with any feedback on how these tariffs are affecting your operations.Visit SEMI Global Advocacy to learn more about public policy efforts and developments as well as how your company or organization can get involved.Scarlett Bickerton, Manager, Federal State Affairs at SEMI.

The new Administration in the United States has been aggressively focusing on trade measures to establish more balanced relationships with its trading partners, according to the White House.Over the last several weeks, President Trump declared a U.S. economic emergency and announced a universal 10% tariff on all countries, which went into effect on April 5, 2025. There are also levies that Trump has called “reciprocal,” including a 34% tariff on Chinese goods and a 20% tariff on European Union imports, that started on April 9.Previously announced 25% tariffs on foreign-made autos and certain auto parts are also now in effect.Presently, finished semiconductors are exempt from these tariffs, however, a Federal Register notice provided the following update:On April 1, the Secretary of Commerce initiated an investigation under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act (19 U.S.C. 1862) to determine the effects on national security of imports of semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME), and their derivative products. This includes, among other things, semiconductor substrates and bare wafers, legacy chips, leading-edge chips, microelectronics, and SME components. Derivative products include downstream products that contain semiconductors, such as those that make up the electronics supply chain. The SEMI Advocacy team is working side by side with member companies in the U.S. to prepare industry’s response for the public comment period tied to the 232 investigation. Comments are due May 7. (Update: SEMI comments submitted.)SEMI has been tirelessly working to educate new policymakers and regulators about the negative impacts the proposed tariffs have on the semiconductor industry. Ajit Manocha, President and CEO of SEMI, and Joe Stockunas, President of SEMI Americas, have been to Washington, D.C. for a series of meetings with administration officials and on Capitol Hill. Clarity on the recent tariff announcements — and guidance on what could come next — has been at the top of the agenda. Additionally, many member company executives recently attended the SEMI Washington Fly-In to advocate for policies that support the global supply chain on Capitol Hill, and the topic of tariffs was of the highest priority for congressional staff.Considering the complexities of the semiconductor industry supply chain, U.S. companies must rely on highly specialized materials, equipment, and components sourced from multiple countries. Strategically deployed and comprehensively assessed trade actions ensure that U.S. businesses maintain market access to critical supplies and remain globally competitive.Additionally, SEMI has highlighted that through fair and reciprocal trade practices, the U.S. can avoid unintended cost increases, supply chain disruptions, and ultimately any risks to American competitiveness in the global marketplace. Coordinating trade policies with allies prevents retaliatory tariffs for industries critical for national security, such as the semiconductor industry, and keeps costs competitive for consumers and industries, all while fostering a more resilient domestic manufacturing ecosystem. Semiconductor companies make substantial investments in building new facilities, and policy stability and predictability are key factors in site selections. With governments around the world putting incentives in place to bolster their semiconductor ecosystems, and to attract industry investments and good-paying jobs, public-private synchronization on trade policies is crucial to help the U.S. meet its technology innovation goals.Visit SEMI Global Advocacy to learn more about public policy efforts and developments as well as how your company or organization can get involved.John Cooney is VP, Global Advocacy Public Policy at SEMI.

The White House and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that the United States has reached final terms on the U.S.-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA). The USMCA provides important modifications and updates to the 25-year old North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and SEMI supports its timely ratification in the U.S. Congress. The USMCA includes significant provisions to protect continued innovation and North American market access across product design and manufacturing supply chains for the electronics industry. The agreement strengthens requirements for the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights, including trade secrets. The U.S. microelectronics industry will benefit greatly from USMCA’s strong enforcement mechanism for the misappropriation of trade secrets including civil procedures and remedies, criminal penalties, and judicial procedures to prevent disclosure of trade secrets in litigation.The agreement also establishes new rules to enhance and protect digital trade to benefit companies of all sizes and consumers. The USMCA prohibits tariffs, taxes and other barriers to cross-border data flows and minimizes restrictions on where data can be stored and processed. These provisions establish important precedents for data and digital technology in future trade agreements. The USMCA aligns with SEMI’s core principles including open global markets, fair competition and the protection of intellectual property rights. Mexico and Canada are two of the United States’ most important trading partners, and strengthening the three countries’ mutual obligations under USMCA will greatly benefit SEMI members. SEMI welcomes final passage of the USMCA and the critical certainty it will bring to trade rules within North America going forward.Joe Pasetti is Vice President, Global Public Policy Advocacy, at SEMI.

The U.S. on September 1 will levy a 10 percent tariff on $300 billion (List 4) worth of Chinese goods that until now were exempt from duties, President Trump said today. The trade action makes good on the U.S. president’s commitment to impose the new round tariffs in response to China’s failure to deliver on promises to buy more U.S. farm goods and to stop the flow of the painkiller fentanyl into the U.S. The 25 percent tariffs already in effect on $250 billion in goods will remain in place.The new list includes items used in the electronics industry but also encompasses retail products spanning the U.S. economy including clothing, toys and cell phones, exacting a more direct hit to U.S. consumers. A meeting between China and U.S. trade officials in Shanghai this week apparently did little to ease trade tensions. Both sides plan to meet again in September, though expectations for meaningful progress toward resolving their trade differences then are low.The U.S. believes China backtracked from commitments to changing its practices related to forced technology transfer and intellectual property theft. China denies making the pledges and insists on the removal of all tariffs as part of a settlement.The U.S. actions risk backlash from China including non-tariff barriers to trade such as licensing delays, more stringent business-related inspections, and an accelerated rollout of its unreliable entities list, China’s response to the U.S. decision to blacklist telecommunications giant Huawei. The list includes foreign companies, other organizations and individuals that China sees as national security threats or risks to China’s economy.SEMI will continue to urge both nations to reach an agreement consistent with its 10 Principles for the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain in Modern Trade Agreements. The principles encourage free and fair trade, open markets, and respect of IP among all players in the global electronics manufacturing supply chain.SEMI member companies impacted by the new U.S. tariffs or facing any new non-tariff barriers in China should contact Jay Chittooran, public policy manager in SEMI’s Global Advocacy Office, at [email protected] Russo is vice president of Global Industry Advocacy at SEMI.

In testimony today before a U.S. government interagency panel considering tariffs on $300 billion worth of Chinese goods, SEMI called for the removal of about 30 tariff lines, which cover items central to the semiconductor manufacturing process.Mike Russo, vice president of global industry advocacy at SEMI, explained in his testimony that while SEMI strongly supports efforts to better protect valuable intellectual property (IP), tariffs will not help address Chinese trade practices, and will ultimately have significant and unintended consequences.SEMI asserts that these tariffs will harm not only companies operating in the U.S., but other companies as well in the semiconductor supply chain by increasing costs, introducing uncertainty, and most problematically, stifling innovation. Collectively, SEMI estimates that this round of tariffs will cost its 430 U.S. members millions annually in additional duties. All told, SEMI estimates that all U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs will cost members nearly $800 million in annual duties.SEMI’s full written comments note that these tariffs, on top of those already in force and the retaliatory tariffs, will hamstring the industry. The tariffs seem to target firms for simply operating in China. Given that tools, materials, and related products are extremely complex, precise, and difficult to manufacture, it is unreasonable to believe that a constituent component can simply be replaced with a part or tool from another source. Further, this U.S. government approach does not take into account that many items subject to these tariffs are not available, at sufficient quality and cost, from domestic sources, or even non-Chinese sources.Over the past year, SEMI has submitted written comments and offered testimony on the three previous rounds of tariffs, which covered about $250 billion worth of Chinese goods, or about half of all imports from China. The tariffs hit various components in the electronics manufacturing supply chain critical to the semiconductor industry, including materials and equipment used to manufacture wafers, boules, and chips as well as test, inspection and sensing equipment. We urge SEMI members to review the $300 billion U.S. tariff list to determine the level, if any, of impact. We also strongly encourage members to review Chinese retaliatory lists as well. Any SEMI members with questions should contact Jay Chittooran, Global Public Policy Manager at SEMI, at [email protected].

SEMI, with 660 other companies and associations, urged the Trump Administration in a letter today not to escalate its trade dispute with China by imposing new tariffs and to negotiate a resolution. The letter comes as the Office of the United States Trade Representative prepares for hearings next week in considering 25 percent tariffs on $300 billion worth of Chinese goods, including a number of products used in semiconductor manufacturing.With intellectual property (IP) the crown jewel of the semiconductor industry, SEMI vigorously supports the stronger IP protections direly needed in international trade. However, we worry that the proposed and recently implemented tariffs will hurt companies in the semiconductor supply chain by introducing significant uncertainty, increasing costs and subjecting companies to retaliatory tariffs while ultimately doing nothing to address our concerns regarding China’s trade practices. We strongly encourage the administration to return to the negotiating table while working with our allies to develop global, enforceable trade solutions. There are no winners in a trade war. Senior industry executives and SEMI staff raised this and other issues with policymakers last month as part of SEMI’s Spring Washington Forum. SEMI will continue to engage the Trump Administration as trade tensions continue.Jay Chittooran is public policy manager at SEMI. He can by reached at [email protected].

Tensions between the United States and China have reached fever pitch. Ongoing trade negotiations between the U.S. and China broke down earlier this month over reported backpedaling by China on key concessions in a proposed Trump administration deal. Over the past year, the U.S. has raised tariffs on more than $250 billion worth of Chinese goods to 25 percent, and last week the administration proposed tariff hikes on an additional $300 billion in imports – moves that have drawn retaliatory tariffs from China, many squarely hitting the semiconductor industry. Based on SEMI member feedback, the tariff increases will cost the semiconductor industry more than $750 million annually.At the same time, the Trump Administration is taking other steps to ratchet up pressure on China. Last week, seven months after placing Fujian Jinhua on the Entity List, which effectively blocks the sale of and export of goods to China, the U.S. Department of Commerce added Huawei (and nearly 70 affiliates) to the list. While the U.S. is taking this action for security reasons, it is also seen as a move to create leverage at the trade table. The U.S. is also intensifying efforts to reform the export control regime, focusing first on enhancing controls on emerging technologies and then on foundational technologies. The rising pressure has prompted China to contemplate and launch a counteroffensive that goes well beyond tariffs and export controls. The reprisals include China’s promotion of heightened Chinese nationalism by domestic consumers, a tactical slowdown of administrative processes required to conduct business in China, and the imposition of direct or indirect limits to market access. China is also using U.S. actions to justify larger state investments in its domestic industry and is ramping up efforts to give other regions greater access to its markets as it works to strengthen those relations ahead of next month’s G-20 summit in Osaka, Japan. The U.S. is also maneuvering to bolster its negotiating hand through its own agreements with Japan and the European Union.Unintended consequences of Trump administration actionsThe Trump administration’s moves to rectify the trade imbalance with China are also well-intentioned in seeking to protect the IP of U.S. technology companies and ensure continued U.S. leadership in technology development and innovation. However, its tactics can encourage long-term, perverse shifts in the globally integrated electronics manufacturing supply chain that risk upending market-driven investments in the semiconductor industry and weakening natural market forces that nourish competition among companies based on service, quality and product offerings.It is critical for SEMI, in working with government officials, to shed light on the potentially deep, unintended damage its trade actions can wreak on global supply chains and markets. We will continue to promote global standards governing trade, IP and market access through our Global Trade Principles and focus on sustaining a global order that assures the electronics manufacturing supply chain remains cohesive and vibrant.SEMI continues efforts to influence trade policyWe continue to meet with government policymakers around the world to educate them on near- and long-term impacts and risks of their evolving trade practices, conducting approximately 220 meetings with government officials globally in the past year. We also facilitate individual and group member meetings to give SEMI members direct contact to key government decision-makers. For example, on May 22nd during the SEMI Spring Washington Forum, or “fly-in,” more than 30 semiconductor industry executives from across the supply chain met with administration officials and Congressional offices to discuss issues including trade, export controls and immigration reform and impacts on their businesses. The executives represented a cross-section of small, medium, large and global companies based in the U.S. or providing support for U.S. organizations. Their aim: influence policy development. SEMI is in a unique position as a representative of the end-to-end, global electronics manufacturing supply chain and is a valuable “one-stop-shop” that represents members on policy while providing opportunities to collaborate in one of our Technology Communities. SEMI members can also leverage our strategic partnerships, our market research or leadership in industry standards. With this breadth and depth of member engagement and industry expertise, SEMI leads in providing industry insights to governments at this critical time. There is no doubt that the current situation is complicated and it is impossible to predict when or how the trade issues will be settled. As the U.S. and China work to settle the trade dispute, SEMI will continue to lead efforts to ensure that the voices of SEMI members and the electronics industry supply chain are heard.Mike Russo is vice president of Global Industry Advocacy at SEMI.

Today, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), as part of its Section 301 investigation into China's trade practices, released a list of approximately $300 billion worth of Chinese goods, including a number in the semiconductor supply chain, that would face a tariff of up to a 25 percent. SEMI is working with members to assess the industry impact and will submit written comments and testify against the tariffs at a public hearing scheduled for mid-June.SEMI encourages members to review the new list and determine the level, if any, of impact.Today’s announcement follows last Friday’s tariff hike from 10 percent to 25 percent on $200 billion of imports from China. All told, the U.S. already has levied tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods that include materials and machines critical to semiconductor manufacturing. The expanded list released Monday would impose tariffs on essentially all imports from China. For its part, China has announced retaliatory tariffs, but more are likely coming.SEMI has been steadfast in its opposition to these tariffs and other barriers to global commerce. Over the past year, SEMI has submitted numerous written comments and offered testimony on the damaging impact of tariffs to the semiconductor industry. While SEMI strongly supports efforts to strengthen intellectual property protections, we believe that the tariff increases will do nothing to address concerns over China’s trade practices but, instead, harm companies in the semiconductor supply chain by increasing business costs, introducing uncertainty and stifling innovation.SEMI will continue tracking ongoing trade developments. SEMI members with questions should contact Jay Chittooran, global public policy manager at SEMI, at [email protected].

Yesterday, President Trump extended the deadline for List 3, which would have raised U.S. tariffs on $200 billion worth of goods from China. SEMI welcomes the deadline extension.Over the past three months, the United States and China have engaged in bilateral discussions to address structural issues like intellectual property protection and requirements for the use of joint ventures as well as trade balance concerns. President Trump announced that these talks have yielded significant and substantial progress in all areas. That said, it’s been reported that discussions on structural issues, such as forced technology transfer, have seen limited progress.Certainly, questions remain on the specifics of liberalization, the structure of the agreement and, most notably, enforcement. Any new commitment will be toothless without a firm and binding enforcement mechanism. While the date of the new deadline hasn’t been clarified, we believe that the tariffs won’t be increased before Presidents Trump and Xi meet, which could happen in late March at Mar-a-Lago.List 3 covers a range of items, including a number of consumer goods, but also directly impacts items critical to the semiconductor manufacturing process, including materials and machines. SEMI estimates that all U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs – which hit machines and tools central to the semiconductor industry, including equipment used to manufacture wafers, boules, and chips as well as test, inspection and sensing equipment – will cost members more than $700 million in annual duties.While SEMI strongly supports stronger protections for valuable intellectual property (IP), tariffs will not help address Chinese trade practices and will ultimately have significant and unintended consequences. SEMI asserts that these tariffs will harm companies in the semiconductor supply chain by increasing business costs, introducing uncertainty, and stifling innovation. The tariffs seem to target U.S. firms for simply operating in China.Given that chips, tools, and materials are extremely complex, precise, and difficult to manufacture, it is not reasonable to believe that any component can easily be replaced with a part from another source. Further, this U.S. government approach does not take into account that many items subject to these tariffs are not available, at sufficient quality and cost, from domestic sources, or even non-Chinese sources. We stand steadfast in our belief that this trade action will raise prices, put thousands of high-paying and high skill jobs at risk, and curb growth.SEMI will continue monitoring new developments in this area. Any SEMI members with questions should contact Jay Chittooran, Global Public Policy Manager at SEMI, at [email protected].