downloadGroupGroupnoun_press release_995423_000000 copyGroupnoun_Feed_96767_000000Group 19noun_pictures_1817522_000000Member company iconResource item iconStore item iconGroup 19Group 19noun_Photo_2085192_000000 Copynoun_presentation_2096081_000000Group 19Group Copy 7noun_webinar_692730_000000Path
Skip to main content
Default Banner Image

imec

How imec turned a climate literacy workshop into a blueprint for sustainability engagement across the semiconductor industry. The StoryWouter de Groot had spent 9 years at imec in Business Development, a role that kept him airborne across Europe and beyond. Wouter was good at his job, and the travel was part of it. But on a flight somewhere over the Atlantic, his calculus changed.Wouter couldn’t ignore the carbon footprint of his own professional life. He realized, “I couldn’t reduce my travel significantly […] but I could raise awareness.” A seed was planted.In France, Wouter discovered the “Climate Fresk” (La Fresque du Climat), a collaborative, card-based workshop built on science from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). He got trained as a facilitator and returned to imec’s Leuven headquarters with a quiet mission. The first session, held with a small group of HR colleagues in late 2023, was intended as a test. Yet even for that test, what happened surprised everyone in the room:"I was blown away by the depth of the discussions. It wasn't just about facts. It was about how people felt, and what they wanted to do next." —Wim Fyen, Director of Sustainability, imec .custom-quote-block { border-left: 4px solid #d9d9d9; padding-left: 26px; margin: 24px 0; } .custom-quote-block blockquote { margin: 0; padding: 0; border: none; } .custom-quote-block p { margin: 0; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.6; font-style: italic; color: #000; } This is the story of those people, the initial hesitations they faced, and the tipping points that firmly established imec’s Climate Fresk movement. The People: 6 Unique Entry PointsBy the time imec presented at the SEMI Climate Equity and Social Impact (CESI) workgroup in June 2025, more than 400 employees had participated. What made it work wasn’t a mandate or a budget line. It was 6 people who found their way to the Climate Fresk from completely different starting points. Without any coordinated plan, they built something unlike anything imec had ever seen. From the 6:Wouter de Groot acted before there was infrastructure in place. Certified with sponsorship from imec, he ran the first session himself and passed it on to anyone willing.Ann-Sophie Vanwinsen, a Procurement Specialist, got certified as a Climate Fresk facilitator outside imec, well before the program was ever offered internally. Vanwinsen has facilitated more sessions than anyone else at the company. She confessed, “I’ve shamelessly taken over using my job for sustainability purposes.”Matthias Nauwelaers from imec.academy felt very emotional during his first session. A graph showing the climate burden falling on future generations hit him somewhere data alone never had. He too signed up as a facilitator and now weaves the Fresk into employee onboarding and e-learning sessions on sustainability.Wouter Machiels, Head of Procurement, came in skeptical. Sustainability, in his experience, had mostly been a compliance checkbox. While Wouter wanted to do more, he felt he lacked the specific tools to act on instincts he already had. The Fresk gave Wouter a framework he hadn’t found elsewhere: “it explained a number of mechanisms I had in the back of my head but couldn’t vocalize.” He left a facilitator himself and has since built a team mapping imec’s entire Scope 3 emissions.Lizzie Boakes, one of imec’s Life Cycle Assessment researchers and a ‘SEMI Europe 20 Under 30’ honoree, described what shifted for her: “I’m usually trying to hit numerical targets that don’t seem very real or human. The Fresk takes the scientific aspects out and highlights the social components. It puts people in a position where they have to be expressive with individuals they’re not necessarily close with.” Boakes became a facilitator, too.Filip Merckx, CFO, felt anger, then urgency, then a sense of responsibility he couldn’t shake. He introduced the Fresk to his entire management team on an offsite and became co-chair of a newly established sustainability board.“Easy in hindsight to say everything was planned, but it wasn’t,” said Wim Fyen, imec’s Director of Sustainability, who served as the connective tissue throughout. “We just went with the flow.”The Hesitation: Bridging Bottom Up and Top Down Senior management valued sustainability, but a 4-hour workshop was a significant ask in a calendar already full. The early response was practical rather than resistant: how do we justify the time? It’s a familiar dynamic. Research on bottom-up sustainability initiatives notes that organizations relying primarily on top-down approaches can miss innovative insights that emerge from employees at all organizational levels (Erzurumlu et al., 2025). Imec found a way around it.Fyen looked for the most efficient way to get it rolled out in imec. He first got the Climate Fresk listed in imec’s learning management system (LMS), a small move that gave it organizational legitimacy without requiring anyone to mandate it. Once the training appeared in the company’s catalog, Fyen leveraged that legitimacy to persuade managers to participate. The budget problem landed differently. Getting the first cohort of facilitators trained required money nobody had earmarked. Machiels solved it by encouraging like-minded suppliers to make sustainable initiative contributions. As a result, the first group got financed without a single line item in the sustainability budget.Both moves mattered. The same research argues that meaningful change requires not only employee initiative but also adequate executive support and corporate financial resources to sustain it (Erzurumlu et al., 2025). The LMS listing supplied the institutional legitimacy. The supplier co-investment supplied the resources. Together they pulled the Fresk from ‘one person’s project’ into something the organization could carry."You train 1 person as facilitator for less than 1,000 euros, and then they can run unlimited sessions inside the company at just a few euros per participant for license fees. Compared to external coaches, it's 30 times more cost-efficient." —Wim FyenThat economics produced a virtuous cycle. Low cost per session lowered the bar for departments to host one. Each session generated interest, which recruited more facilitators, which enabled more sessions. Similar grassroots-to-organizational arcs have played out elsewhere in the industry, where employee-led sustainability initiatives at ASML gained traction once they were paired with executive sponsorship (https://www.semi.org/en/blogs/one-tree-per-employee-how-a-grassroots-initiative-in-asml-san-diego-is-assembling-restorative-future-with-real-results). At imec, the initial constraint of having no dedicated training budget became a feature: it forced a model lean enough to scale. Participants in imec Climate Fresk Workshop for ManagersThe Tipping Points: When Organic Became StructuralWhat came next for imec was a mass Fresk; 50 managers, 14 internal facilitators, 1 afternoon. During the workshop, each participant wrote a personal commitment on seed paper, and those seeds were planted on the imec campus. "The flowers represented their ideas blooming," Fyen said. For a scientific culture, having something tangible to point to mattered. Not long after this, in late 2024, the team of Climate Fresk facilitators received the Sustainable.minds award at imec's annual corporate personnel event, recognized for sparking vital conversations about sustainability and inspiring action for the planet. For a community of facilitators that had grown almost entirely through word of mouth, this formal recognition validated what they had already built and gave their work significant internal visibility.In 2025, entire departments were booking on-demand sessions. About 25% of all participants expressed interest in becoming facilitators themselves. But why? According to a group of French environmental psychologists, emotional engagement is one of the primary pathways through which collaborative climate workshops produce real attitudinal change and pro-environmental intent (Hognon et al., 2026). And the good feeling that follows, which some researchers call the "warm glow," creates a self-reinforcing cycle toward deeper engagement (Schneider et al., 2021)."Convinced that without the information of the Climate Fresk, and without my team having lived through it themselves, we would not be where we are today in value chain mapping and the visibility we have on our Scope 3." —Wouter Machiels, Head of Procurement, imecScaling beyond the borders to impact the entire value chain Fueled by the recognition given by the Sustainable.minds awards, the team began offering Climate Fresk sessions to imec’s partners at the biannual Partner Technical Week (PTW) international conference and the workshop started crossing imec’s borders for the first time. This brought it to the attention of SEMI members. At a CESI workgroup meeting in 2025, participants from Tokyo Electron, Axcelis, Advantest, Applied Materials and Veeco among others listened to imec’s story and asked how to bring it to all of SEMI’s membership. Wojtek Osowiecki at Lam Research, founder of the Lam Employee Sustainability Community, was one of the first outside participants at an imec Fresk. He put it simply: “It’s not just about awareness. It’s about empowerment. The Fresk gives people a voice and a framework for action.” By the Fall of 2025, the first Fresk had been held at SEMICON West, and conversations with SEMI member companies were underway. What had been an internal experiment was now something other organizations wanted to learn from.A Movement of Belonging with Concrete Outcomes Founded in 1984 as the 'chip lab of the world,' imec has always been committed to sustainable development for generations to come by teaming up with the entire microchip value chainIts biggest leverage takes place through its Sustainable Semiconductor Technologies and Systems (SSTS) program in which imec works closely with partners from across the industry to assess and reduce the environmental impact of chip manufacturing, including foundries, integrated device manufacturers, equipment suppliers, and materials companies.This program runs along two connected tracks: assessment, whereby the environmental footprint of current and next-generation integrated circuit technologies are quantified and improvement where the insights of the first track are used to develop and validate practical solutions (e.g. to reduce process-related emissions, including work on low-impact gases, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) alternatives, and novel manufacturing processes).The success with the Climate Fresk workshop has also begun to feed the broader SSTS program. Tools like the Environmental Score, originally developed for chip manufacturing assessment, are now being integrated into other design processes across the organization. The Fresk is now one of the vehicles imec uses to train and inspire the people who will carry that integration into their day-to-day work; the workshop builds the awareness, and SSTS gives that awareness somewhere to go.And there are several noteworthy concrete outcomes across imec:An ESG board now exists at the executive level, where leaders set corporate sustainability goals and assign the resources to pursue them. That board did not exist prior to the Climate Fresk. It was an indirect consequence of the awareness created within the finance team after Merckx introduced the workshop to his management. Decisions about sustainability that had previously lived in scattered conversations now have an institutional home.Onboarding has changed too. Nauwelaers, from imec.academy, has woven the Fresk into how new employees encounter imec. Sustainability is no longer a topic that gets introduced after someone is hired and oriented; it is part of the introduction itself. New colleagues meet the company’s climate posture in their first weeks rather than their first year.And in procurement, Machiels has built a sustainable procurement team of 3 FTEs and a PhD student, supported by a supplier co-investment model. The team operates against a multi-year sustainability plan and has produced the most detailed picture of imec’s Scope 3 emissions the company has ever had. The procurement function, often the last to be touched by sustainability work, became one of the first at imec to be reshaped by it.Fyen is honest about the distance still to travel. At 600+ participants in a company of 6,500 (roughly half non-payroll), imec has reached roughly 20% of its own workforce. That means in principle there are still thousands to reach. But Climate Fresk facilitators are now embedded in every corner of the organization, people who came to a workshop for their own reasons and left with a mission they didn’t expect. And more importantly, social science learns us that once a critical ‘tipping point’ is reached, adoption can grow very rapidly (Centola et. al., 2018). Machiels observed that the Fresk quietly became one of the few things that gave colleagues from completely different parts of imec a genuine sense of belonging to something. Climate Fresk has allowed them to understand the science, hear the human stories, and start connecting the dots. In a world of hybrid schedules and activity-based offices, for the people inside imec who went through the workshop together, that shared experience has become something else too.From a quiet decision on a plane, imec built a movement that now extends well beyond its own walls. Those seeds are available to any company where even one person is willing to start.This case study was written by Nat Mengist and Marley Hauser. It was produced by SEMI in partnership with imec as part of the SEMI Climate Equity and Social Impact (CESI) workgroup, led by staff member Justin Harris ([email protected]). For more information, visit semi.org/sustainability or connect through the SEMI CESI workgroup. SEMI SUSTAINABILITY CASE STUDY ADDENDUMA Blueprint for Building Your Own Climate Fresk MovementWhat imec built was not a program. It was a set of conditions. The following 5 steps are drawn from their experience; a starting backbone that your organization can adapt, with imec and the CESI workgroup as a resource to build it out further.1. Find the person who won't wait for permission.Every successful rollout in imec's story starts with someone who acts independently of pre-existing infrastructure. That person is probably already in your organization. Find them, fund their facilitator training, and let them shine. Research conducted on Wojtek Osowiecki’s Lam Employee Sustainability Community shows that this kind of bottom-up entrepreneurial ownership produces the most durable organizational commitment (Erzurumlu et al., 2025).2. Give it a home in the official infrastructure.Getting the Climate Fresk listed in imec's learning management system moved it from "one person's project" to "an official training." That's a small change with a large impact. Connect your internal champion with key departments like HR or Learning Development. Sustainability initiatives that live only inside the sustainability team have a ceiling. The ones that spread into other departments like HR, Procurement, and Operations don't.3. Protect the emotional architecture of the workshop.The instinct is to shorten the workshop to fit busy schedules. Imec did the opposite, extending to 4 hours and adding a plenary on personal and corporate carbon footprints. The "Embrace Your Emotions" phase isn't optional. It's the mechanism through which information becomes motivation. This is the worrying and urgency feeling Filip Merckx described. Some research found this “negative affect” to be the single strongest predictor of willingness to engage in climate action (Brosch, 2021). Cut that phase and you save an hour, but you’ll also miss the point.4. Build for the skeptical majority, not the converted few.The Climate Fresk also works well with technical audiences because it's built on IPCC science and run by a neutral peer rather than an external consultant. When a colleague walks you through the system map, the psychological distance that usually makes climate change feel abstract suddenly collapses. By developing teams of internal facilitators across departments, levels, and geographies, you will begin to witness the “gradual accumulation” of passionate sustainability culture (Russi et al., 2024).5. Extend your horizon beyond 12 months.The procurement team Wouter Machiels built — 4 FTEs, a PhD student, a supplier co-investment model — didn't exist when the Fresk was first introduced. "Facts are the foundation, but stories are the vehicle," Wouter claimed. "You can broadcast facts all you want. If you're not having an impact on the people listening to you, then you're casting salt." Don't expect ROI within one budget cycle. The outcomes that matter most take years to show up. But they do show up. Research FoundationThe behavioral science behind the Climate Fresk is not incidental to its design: it is the design. The following sources informed both the blueprint above and the case study narrative.Brosch, T. (2021). Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action: A review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Human Response to Climate Change: From Neurons to Collective Action, 42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.001Centola, D., Becker, J., Brackbill, D., Baronchelli, A., (2018). Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention. Science 360,1116-1119.https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aas8827 Erzurumlu, S. S., Osowiecki, W. T., Seidel, V. P. (2025). How an Environmental Sustainability Community Fostered Employee-Driven Innovation at Lam Research. Research-Technology Management, 68(4), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2025.2497220Hognon, L., Caille, P., Bernard, P., Chevance, G., Teran-Escobar, C. (2025). Assessing the impact of The Climate Fresk workshop on climate-related attitudes and behavioral intentions in the workplace: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2qvgd_v1). PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2qvgd_v1Hognon, L., Teran-Escobar, C., Bernard, P., Chevance, G., Caille, P. (2026). A call for robust evaluations of the impacts of serious games for climate change mitigation: The Climate Fresk as a global case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 110, 102942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.102942Mosquera, J., Jylhä, K. M. (2022). How to Feel About Climate Change? An Analysis of the Normativity of Climate Emotions. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 30(3), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2022.2125150Russi, L., Renouard, C., Wallenhorst, N. (2024). Beyond Rupture, Interstice and Reform: Searching for Nuance in the Portrayal of Engagement for Social and Ecological Transition. Journal of Business Ethics, 193(3), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05568-wSchneider, C. R., Zaval, L., Markowitz, E. M. (2021). Positive emotions and climate change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Human Response to Climate Change: From Neurons to Collective Action, 42, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.009
Read More
The semiconductor industry is undergoing a rapid transformation. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications, such as agentic and physical AI, push compute demands to unprecedented heights, prompting the semiconductor industry to push the boundaries of 2nm technology and beyond. Yet, as we move to these advanced semiconductor technology nodes, it has become increasingly challenging for academic research to remain closely connected with the fast-evolving industrial developments, limiting academic researchers in driving innovation. Europe’s NanoIC pilot line, a pioneering European initiative, hosted by imec, is addressing this challenge by offering pathfinding process design kits (P-PDKs). To cover the potential of these P-PDKs and their impact on Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem, we sat together with Professor Mehdi Tahoori (professor at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) and Anita Farokhnejad (DTCO Program Manager at imec).SEMI: What exactly is a P-PDK, and how does it differ from traditional PDKs?Farokhnejad: At its core, a process design kit (PDK) is a software environment that enables circuit designers to simulate, validate, and optimize chip designs using realistic models of chip technology. Consider it a blueprint or a simulation toolkit allowing chip designers to explore performance, power, and manufacturability of a new chip architecture in a virtual sandbox. What sets P-PDKs apart is that they anticipate future technologies. Unlike traditional PDKs, which are based on existing technologies, P-PDKs are built on predictive models of future nodes and architectures. This allows researchers to explore system-level trade-offs, assess architectural implications, and prepare design flows before a technology reaches maturity. SEMI: Why are they so crucial for academia?Tahoori: For decades, academic researchers could contribute to semiconductor innovation using abstraction layers that allowed them to design and test new architectures without direct access to the latest technologies. This approach worked well until the industry reached the 20-nanometer node. At that point, the complexity of semiconductor design increased, with the introduction of advanced device architectures like FinFETs, nanosheets, Forksheets, CFETs, and novel integration solutions such as 3D stacking and chiplet integration.Transistor scaling in the AI eraTraditional abstraction models could no longer keep up with these advances, and the gap between academic research and industrial practice began to widen. This growing gap started to limit academia’s ability to participate in semiconductor paradigm shifts, such as CMOS 2.0 and new computing architectures. P-PDKs, enabled by the NanoIC pilot line, aim to bridge this gap, restoring the connection between academic thinking and industrial progress.SEMI: How does this support semiconductor innovation in Europe?Tahoori: Universities are ideally positioned to drive out-of-the-box innovation and invent new paradigms for computing. This is where universities truly excel. But to do that, they need access to the latest technologies and tools. We see for example a strong focus on the AI revolution and how the microelectronics industry is enabling that transformation. To meet the demands of AI applications and the computing power they require, we need to design new computing architectures based on advanced technology nodes. This is precisely the academic area of expertise. To design these new AI computing architectures, however, we need the most advanced technologies available. The P-PDKs for advanced nodes provided by the NanoIC pilot line now make this kind of research possible at universities. Something that was not feasible before.Additionally, the P-PDKs also provide an important reference technology and platform to benchmark and validate these innovations within a next-generation design roadmap. This means researchers can test their novel architectures against realistic process and performance metrics.SEMI: Are they only available for academia?Farokhnejad: The NanoIC P-PDKs are meant to be accessible to foster innovation across Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem. These advanced PDKs are therefore also available to European research organizations, startups, and industry partners. Access is facilitated through Europractice, where eligible users can apply by signing a Design Kit License Agreement (DKLA). Once approved, they gain access to the PDKs.SEMI: What other technology nodes are NanoIC’s PDKs addressing?Farokhnejad: The first P-PDK was released in June (first version of the N2) and supports frontside and backside routing with TSVM, standard cell libraries, and multiple VT flavors for early-stage design exploration. Upcoming releases include new versions of the N2 P-PDK, as well as A14 and A7 PDKs, eDRAM and SOT memory PDKs, and advanced interconnect solutions such as redistribution layers (RDL), hybrid bonding, and interposers.Those interested in learning more about the NanoIC ecosystem and the research enabled by the P-PDKs can meet representatives and partners of the NanoIC pilot line during SEMICON Europa, November 18-21 at booth C2417 in Messe Munchen. More information about the initiative is also available on the NanoIC website.BiosMehdi Tahoori, Professor Chair of Dependable Nano-Computing - Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Mehdi B. Tahoori is Professor and Chair of Dependable Nano-Computing at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany, and guest professor at imec, focusing on CMOS 2.0 and future chip technologies. He previously worked at Xilinx (USA), Fujitsu Labs (USA), and served as a junior professor at Boston Northeastern University (USA) and as a visiting professor at the University of Tokyo (Japan). He earned his B.S. from Sharif University (Iran) and M.S./Ph.D. from Stanford (USA). Prof. Tahoori is Deputy Editor-in-Chief of IEEE Design and Test Magazine, is a former Editor-in-Chief of Elsevier Microelectronic Reliability and has chaired major IEEE symposia. His honors include multiple best paper nominations and conference awards, the US National Science Foundation Early Faculty Development (CAREER) Award (2008), an ERC Advanced Grant (2022), and an IEEE fellowship.Anita Farokhnejad, DTCO Program Manager - imec Anita Farokhnejad earned her PhD from Universitat Rovira i Virgili (Spain), specializing in FEOL and device modelling. She joined imec in 2021 as an R D Engineer, focusing on BEOL optimization and future roadmap development. Collaborating closely with integration and physical design teams, she develops models for PnR data analysis and BEOL optimization. Her recent work on the enhanced Ring Oscillator (eRO) model aids in the early assessment of new materials and BEOL boosters. In August 2023, she advanced to team lead for PDK Enablement, translating advanced semiconductor nodes into Pathfinding-PDKs. Farokhnejad is also dedicated to education, conducting courses that make sophisticated technological concepts accessible to both industry veterans and aspiring engineers. Currently, she serves as Program Manager of DTCO at imec, where her contributions continue to drive innovation in the semiconductor industry.AcknowledgementThis work was enabled by the NanoIC pilot line. The acquisition and operation are jointly funded by the Chips Joint Undertaking, through the European Union’s Digital Europe (101183266) and Horizon Europe programs (101183277), as well as by the participating states Belgium (Flanders), France, Germany, Finland, Ireland and Romania. For more information, visit https://www.nanoic-project.eu.DisclaimerFunded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or Chips Joint Undertaking. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. SEMI ContactJames Lam, Business Development ManagerEmail: [email protected]
Read More
In the rapidly-evolving semiconductor industry, maintaining a competitive edge is crucial. To position Europe at the forefront of global semiconductor innovation, imec is leading the NanoIC pilot line initiative. Aligned with the European Chips Act, this initiative is a strategic move to bolster Europe's leadership in key markets like high performance computing, automotive, and healthcare.SEMI spoke with Srikanth Samavedam and Jo De Boeck from imec, Belgium, to learn more about the NanoIC pilot line and to better understand its goals, challenges, and prospects. From transitioning to gate-all-around (GAA) nanosheet devices, to developing advanced memory technologies and interconnects, this conversation highlights the cutting-edge advancements made possible through collaboration across the industry’s value chain.SEMI: How is the NanoIC pilot line working to revolutionize the semiconductor industry, and what are its main objectives?Samavedam: The NanoIC pilot line is a European initiative aimed at bridging the gap between R D and industrial innovation. The project is creating a beyond-2nm system-on-chip (SoC) pilot line, developing advanced logic, memory, and interconnect technologies. This effort supports the European Chips Act's vision for leadership and competitiveness in global semiconductor innovation, particularly in critical markets like high performance computing, communication, automotive, energy, and healthcare. However, advanced technologies come with more complexity, and addressing these complexity challenges requires more mature module baseline flows. By improving baseline flow repeatability and variability while reducing defectivity, we can accelerate the development of future technologies. The NanoIC pilot line is working to provide access to these advanced technologies and baselines to develop future compute systems. This will help ensure European competitiveness across the industry – from semiconductor materials, equipment and design to systems and applications.SEMI: Who are the core partners involved in this initiative?De Boeck: Key partners of the pilot line include CEA-Leti, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tyndall National Institute, and the Center for Surface Science and Nanotechnology of the University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest. This project is also supported by the Flemish government, other participating states, and the Chips Joint Undertaking of the EU Chips Act.These institutions and organizations bring a wealth of knowledge and resources, and imec compliments their efforts by providing access to its global partnerships with key industry leaders. The NanoIC pilot line is helping strengthen Europe’s global semiconductor industry leadership while aligning efforts with other regional Chips Acts. SEMI: Can you elaborate on the significance of transitioning from field-effect transistors (FinFETs) transistors to GAA nanosheet devices in CMOS technology?Samavedam: The transition from FinFETs to GAA nanosheet devices is a significant advancement in CMOS device technology. FinFETs have been the backbone of CMOS technology from the 22nm to the 3nm node. But starting at the 2nm node, nanosheet devices will need to be introduced. Nanosheet devices, including variants like Forksheet devices, are expected to drive scaling and performance through three generations – 2nm, A14, and A10. Complementary FET (CFET) architectures are also expected to be introduced around 2031 at the A7 node, which will represent another major inflection point in CMOS device design. This progression requires extensive research into new materials, process modules, equipment, and advanced patterning capabilities using high numerical aperture extreme ultraviolet (high NA EUV) lithography – all of which will be implemented on the NanoIC pilot line. FIGURE PROVIDED BY IMEC │ SCHEMATIC ILLUSTRATION OF A FUTURE COMPUTE SYSTEM. THE SYSTEM IS MADE OF LARGE MULTI-DIE ELECTRICAL-OPTICAL INTERPOSER PROVIDING ELECTRICAL AND OPTICAL INTERCONNECTS BETWEEN THE VARIOUS CHIPLETS (CPUS, GPUS, HBM). ALSO SHOWN ARE CONNECTIONS TO PACKAGE SUBSTRATE, AS WELL AS FIBER CONNECTORS AND AN INTEGRATED LASER SOURCE. CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT (CPU); GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNIT (GPU); HIGH BANDWITH MEMORY (HBM); PROCESSING UNIT THAT CAN INCLUDE CPUS, GPUS, AND OTHER SPECIALIZED PROCESSORS (XPU); APPLICATION-SPECIFIC INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (ASIC); ELECTRONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (EIC); FF-LEVEL: FEMTOFARAD-LEVEL; FIELD-PROGRAMMABLE GATE ARRAY (FGPA); GAAS QD: GALLIUM ARSENIDE QUANTUM DOT; INTEGRATED SILICON PHOTONICS PLATFORM 300MM (ISIPP300); REDISTRIBUTION LAYER (RDL); SILICON PHOTONICS (SIPHO); THROUGH PACKAGE VIA (TPV). SEMI: What are the key innovations necessary for advancing memory technology?Samavedam: As SRAM scaling slows, the exploration of novel, dense embedded memory concepts will become imperative. Technologies like spin orbit torque magnetic RAM (SOT-MRAM) and 2-transistor 0-capacitor (2T0C) embedded DRAM using deposited semiconductors like indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO) are promising. These innovations address memory capacity and bandwidth challenges from new workloads in compute systems. Additionally, developing a 3D memory platform to explore future memory options will be essential for improving SRAM and DRAM. These advancements will help meet the demands of new applications like machine learning, augmented and virtual reality, and autonomous vehicles.SEMI: How do advanced interconnect technologies contribute to the future of semiconductor design?Samavedam: Advanced interconnect technologies, like chip-to-chip lateral (2.5D or interposer technologies) and vertical interconnects (3D technologies), play a crucial role in addressing memory capacity and bandwidth challenges. These technologies enable the partitioning of SoC functions into separate dies, allowing for more efficient and scalable designs. Advances like pitch scaling of micro-bumps and copper (Cu) hybrid bonding are facilitating this fine-grained partitioning of SoC functions. Additionally, optical interconnects and 3D interconnect-enabled co-packaging provide high-bandwidth and low-power connectivity at wafer scale. The rise of chiplet architectures and standardization will also increase the demand for low-cost, tight-pitch interconnect technologies like Cu/polymer redistribution layers.SEMI: How do your collaborators benefit from the NanoIC pilot line? De Boeck: One of the biggest collaborator benefits is the pilot line’s commitment to knowledge sharing through R D access and training. We invite foundries, IDMs, materials suppliers, equipment suppliers, and system companies/OEMs to jointly develop the materials, process modules, and integration flows to accelerate the development of beyond-2nm SoC technology pillars.Design pathfinding and system exploration process design kits (PDKs) will be available for start-ups, small- and medium enterprises, universities, and design and system companies to aid in prototyping and testing their designs. The NanoIC pilot line will also offer comprehensive training programs, including virtual PDK training, bootcamps for faculty, and internships and expert courses for students. To learn more, experts and key partners of the NanoIC pilot line will be presenting from 14 -16:40 at SEMICON Europa on November 12. imec’s program, ITF Chip into the Future, will highlight advancements in digital technology, capacity building through the European Chips Act, and the role of the NanoIC pilot line in accelerating beyond-2nm innovation. The conversation will also address industry requirements for pilot lines, emerging initiatives boosting Europe’s innovation and competitiveness, and perspectives on advanced materials and semiconductor equipment. Srikanth Samavedam, Senior Vice President of Semiconductor Technologies at imec, oversees programs in logic, memory, photonics, and 3D integration. Previously, he was a senior director at GlobalFoundries, leading 14nm FinFET technology into production and developing 7nm CMOS. Starting his career at Motorola, he worked on strained silicon and other advanced materials. He holds a Ph.D. in materials science and engineering from MIT and a master's degree from Purdue University. Jo De Boeck, Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer at imec, oversees the company’s strategic direction and serves on its executive board. He joined imec in 1991 after earning his Ph.D. from KU Leuven and has since held various leadership roles, including head of imec’s Smart Systems and Energy Technology business unit and CTO. De Boeck is also a part-time professor at KU Leuven. Maria Daniela Perez / Communications Manager, SEMI EuropePhone: +49 160 2562977Email: [email protected]
Read More