3D IC

Cultivating trust and keeping his team agile and innovative as they engage with technology partners and customers is a core focus of John Lee, General Manager and Vice President of the Ansys Electronics, Semiconductors, and Optics Business Unit.

I recently spoke with Shi about his talk Looking Forward to the New Chip Cycle during the opening of the 2023 Design Automation Conference, collocated in July with SEMICON West in San Francisco.

As an industry, we must collaborate because it’s going to take a village to solve Multiphysics, which in turn is the key to growth in 3D IC. No individual company can compete on every front.

Charles Shi, Principal, Senior Analyst, Needham & Company, LLC., recently offered an upbeat assessment of the electronic design automation (EDA), silicon intellectual property (IP) and services industries, or what SEMI refers to as the electronic system design (ESD) ecosystem.

Three-dimensional integrated circuits (3D-ICs) are revolutionizing the semiconductor industry. Manufactured by stacking and interconnecting dies so they perform as a single device, 3D-ICs deliver more capabilities by offering higher performance and bandwidth — while also reducing power consumption, package size and costs. However, 3D-ICs present tough design challenges to engineers. Significantly larger than a single-chip system on a chip (SoC), these assemblies have more components, more integration points and longer interconnects, that translate to new risks for high-frequency signal failure, reliability, and other performance issues such as thermal buildup. As the lines between silicon and system continue to blur, engineers must conduct concurrent, multivariate analysis to assess every possible failure mode ― not only at the component level, but also across the entire 3D-IC assembly ― a technical obstacle for many development teams accustomed to applying a series of single-physics engineering simulation tools in a sequential approach. 3D-ICs are assembled in a complex package using a serial analysis approach that doesn’t take into account system-level interactions, as well as the many thousands of bump connection points where something can go wrong. By contrast, concurrent, multivariate simulation and analysis takes into account all physics simultaneously from the earliest prototyping stages of design. Most semiconductor development teams not only lack the technical tools to perform this complex simulation and analysis, but they also face cultural obstacles as they undertake system-level analysis. Diverse teams working with disparate tools simply aren’t equipped to perform seamless handoffs and collaborate effectively on a complex 3D IC design from an early stage. Instead, they scramble to address system-level issues later when launch delays are likely, the cost of rework is high and their positive contributions to the design are diminished. The Value of a True Multiphysics, Multivariate Approach As market demand for 3D-ICs increases, semiconductor development teams need a single simulation platform that enables simultaneous multiphysics analysis — including power integrity, reliability, electromagnetics (EM), thermal, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and mechanical studies ― across the entire assembly. A unified simulation platform that brings together best-in-class solutions for every physics enables semiconductor engineers to collaborate across functions, seamlessly hand off analysis tasks between engines, and partner to optimize 3D-IC designs across every performance parameter. Costly surprises from signal integrity to thermal conductivity and structural strength are far less likely when the team reaches physical assembly to help ensure on-time, cost-effective product launches. An example of simultaneous multivariate analysis of a chip stack showing both thermal gradients and mechanical stress/warpage of the package at an early prototyping stage. By contrast, applying multiple physics sequentially can lead to ongoing and expensive setbacks. For example, as one team resolves signal integrity issues, another team could discover that timing failures or thermal risks have arisen. It’s not only back to the drawing board, but back to a series of time- and resource-intensive handoffs across disconnected simulation and analysis tools, as well as across functional boundaries. The Importance of Considering Novel Physics Because the pressure is on to launch innovative 3D-IC designs rapidly, development teams might be tempted to focus on existing signoff metrics ― which are complicated enough, across today’s multi-die assemblies — but overlook the application of more novel physics. This is a mistake that can result in failures in the field, product recalls, warranty expenses and lasting damage to the brand reputation. To achieve full product confidence across the entire 3D-IC system, semi engineering teams need a solution set and associated best practices that make it fast and intuitive to not only optimize performance and cost, but to concurrently analyze novel physics that will impact electrical reliability, mechanical stability and thermal failure modes. The number of physical effects that need careful simulation has risen in lockstep with Moore’s Law and has increased even more for 3D-IC design. The use of a single, connected platform enables this kind of true multiphysics analysis. A multiphysics platform should interface with popular design systems, and be extensible by Python API's to the user and to other vendors. For example, engineers can check the thermal behavior and the likelihood of melting and local failures of each solder bump based on the electrical current it carries. The engineers can apply computational fluid dynamics to evaluate how well airflows generated by fans and heat sinks work to cool down the assembly. They can maximize system reliability by examining unfamiliar effects like low-frequency power oscillations on the distributed power supply network. Best of all, a unified and purpose-built simulation platform enables semiconductor development teams to conduct all these studies simultaneously to rapidly reveal design trade-offs that arise when many elements are brought together in a complex assembly. Only this type of multiphysics, multivariate, concurrent approach enables engineering teams to reach all their goals for speed, confidence, innovation and product performance as 3D-IC designs take over the global market. Supporting a Culture of Vertical Integration Global leaders in the semiconductor and electronics industries benefit from a culture and organizational model based on vertical integration, which supports high levels of design collaboration. It can be tough for horizontally integrated, smaller companies to establish this depth of collaboration. Customers require open and extensible platforms that support a broad range of analysis tools across many different abstraction levels – from device to chip to board to system. The right simulation technology platform can significantly help. A shared platform that brings cross-functional engineering teams together for simultaneous, not sequential, multiphysics design can make it easy and seamless to collaborate across functional boundaries and support excellence in every aspect of power, performance, reliability and cost. By balancing these foundational performance aspects with simultaneous optimizations of temperature, mechanical stress and other subtle effects, semiconductor engineering teams can position themselves as leaders, not followers, in the 3D-IC revolution. Learn More at the Ansys IDEAS Digital Forum Register for Ansys IDEAS Digital Forum on demand to learn more about 3D-IC best practices from leading industry experts (www.ansys.com/ideas). John Lee is General Manager of the Electronics and Semiconductor Business Unit at Ansys.

Spend any time with Ansys’ John Lee, Rich Goldman or Marc Swinnen and you’ll hear plenty of optimism about the semiconductor industry even though they tick off a long list of looming design challenges. The need for reliable and effective electronic systems, they emphasize, is great and runs through high tech, aerospace and defense, automotive, IoT and 5G with communications being a common denominator. The three are especially bullish these days on changing market dynamics brought on by systems companies building company-specific bespoke, or custom, silicon. These systems companies are building chips with a different perspective and a fresh look at silicon design, a move away from the more traditional segment-specific silicon due to much more complexity. Ansys, a member of the ESD Alliance, a SEMI Technology Community, is a 4,100-employee company with a comprehensive portfolio of multiphysics engineering simulation software for product design, testing and operation products and services. John, Rich, Marc and I focused on Ansys’ semiconductor and electronics segment for our conversation. Smith: When did you notice the move by systems companies to build their own chips? What drives this trend? Lee: The inflection point was about three years ago when hyperscale data center and system companies recognized they needed an enterprise system design platform. They are designing bespoke silicon, driven to do this for cost efficiencies and to avoid relying on outside suppliers. They also want differentiation based on their specific platform needs so they can optimize compute power to their specific needs. Smith: What is driving the trend for multiphysics experience to ensure effective and reliable electronic systems? Lee: The increasing need for multiphysics analysis is acute. The physics of 3D IC, for example, brings in mechanical engineering with the convergence of mechanical and electrical as 3D emerges at the intersection of IC and System. As a result, physics becomes a necessity to analyze the stability of the chip in the package. Goldman: As well, the move to stacked chips, 3D IC and wafer-on-wafer requires thermal, electromagnetic and mechanical analysis in addition to the traditional analysis for function, performance and power. They all need to be analyzed together, not serially. It becomes multiphysics, not multiple physics. Smith: Two distinctly different disciplines – multiple physics and multiphysics – are needed for semiconductor design. How are they different? Why the need now? Swinnen: Multiple physics refers to the sheer breadth of physics that is now needed to analyze from the IC up to the largest system whereas multiphysics refers to the capability to analyze several physical effects concurrently, accounting for their impact on the design and interactions between various physics. Multiphysics are necessary to analyze the full context of the system environment – from nanometers to kilometers – for multi-chip packaging, chip-to-package-to-silicon and systems with multi-domain guidance. Goldman: A self-driving car, as an illustration, includes AI systems-on-chip, solid-state sensors, infotainment systems and radar/lidar detectors that must all work in the rain, the heat and the bitter cold. Smith: Why are design groups being reorganized to include expertise in mechanical and electromagnetic issues? Swinnen: Complexity has exploded, driven by a long list of technical requirements and, perhaps, mischaracterization. Goldman: Just consider the system on chip, mischaracterized by the semiconductor industry. The chip is never a system by itself. Rather, it is a complex component in a larger system and must be analyzed in that context. 3D IC is where this comes together and forces a recognition of physics outside the traditional scope of SoC design. 3D IC chips are much closer together on the board and it takes multiphysics embedded into the workflow of semiconductor design, packaging, system design and 3D IC to ensure they work reliably and efficiently. Smith: What is the solution? Goldman: It’s clear a specialized digital thread is necessary to move disparate groups with expertise in systems, physics and silicon together. Today, these groups or disciplines might not exist in the same company, whether it be a foundry, fabless or outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (OSAT) company. Lee: In order to unify the entire system design environment, a cloud-based, open and extensible heterogenous enterprise compute platform is required. It is similar to the SaaS-based business model and known as Simulation-as-a-Service (also SaaS). While vertical integration of design groups is already taking place at leading system design houses, there have also been advances in electronic design tools. These are starting to offer more comprehensive multiphysics capabilities including thermal, fluid dynamics (CFD), mechanical stress and reliability analysis in a single analysis cockpit. Today’s system designers face two platform challenges: First, they need an environment that is open enough to accept analysis results from multiple sources so that they can be overlapped and cross-analyzed. Second, the design platform must have the capacity to handle the enormous amounts of data generated by the latest 3-nanometer chips and 3D IC systems, and this implies an intimate coupling to elastic cloud computing. The days of an engineer writing Perl scripts and handing it off to someone else are gone. We believe that the industry is responding to this challenge with a new generation of design platforms that a cloud-native, open and extensible to allow heterogenous enterprise design. We are definitely at an inflection point in electronic design today, but the electronic industry has faced these before an we are confident it will master these challenges as well. About Rich Goldman Rich Goldman is director of marketing for the Electronics and Semiconductor Business Unit of Ansys. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Syracuse University and an MBA and Master of Science degree in Engineering Management. Moscow Institute of Electronic Technology (MIET)’s first honorary professor, he is also the recipient of honorary PhD degrees from Russian-Armenian (Slavnoic) University and State Engineering University of Armenia for contributions to the advancement of Armenia’s high-tech education and economic ecosystem. Rich served on EDAC’s board of directors. About John Lee John Lee is general manager and vice president of the Ansys Electronics and Semiconductor Business Unit. Lee co-founded and served as CEO of Gear Design Solutions (now Ansys), developer of the first purpose-built big data platform for integrated circuit design. He cofounded two other startups (Mojave Design and Performance Signal Integrity), which successfully exited into companies now part of Synopsys. He holds undergraduate and graduate degrees from Carnegie Mellon University. About Marc Swinnen Marc Swinnen is director of product marketing for the Electronics and Semiconductor Division of Ansys. He holds Master degrees in Electronic Engineering and Industrial Management from KU Leuven, Belgium, as well as an MBA from San Jose State University. About Bob Smith Robert (Bob) Smith is executive director of the ESD Alliance, a SEMI Technology Community. He is responsible for the management and operations of the ESD Alliance, an international association of companies providing goods and services throughout the semiconductor design ecosystem.

For many technologies, standards unshackle them from patents and enable their mass production – an idea close to the heart of Wendy Chen, associate vice president of the R D Center at King Yuan Electronics Corp. and vice chair of the SEMI Taiwan Test Committee. More importantly, standards are crucial to a product’s commercial success: Producing it in high volume reduces its price and helps drive widespread adoption.With standards part and parcel to the economies of manufacturing , SEMI has sought consensus over the years among key players in materials, equipment, and other manufacturing segments on the importance of standardization in a push to cut costs.Chen first set herself to work on SEMI standards development in 2010, when 74 percent of 3D IC patents were owned by IBM. At the time, SEMI saw the huge potential in 3D IC and believed the lack of technology standards might hamper the future of the semiconductor industry.Motivated by that conviction, SEMI established the 3DS-IC Standard Committee in the U.S. in July 2010 and the SEMI Taiwan 3DS-IC Standard Committee the following year, and before long the committees were working together to form standards targeting mass production at low cost. The Taiwan committee was co-chaired by Wendy Chen, Dr. Yi-shao Lai (Advanced Semiconductor Engineering), and Dr. Zhi-kun Gu (Industrial Technology Research Institute). The trio spearheaded 3DS-IC standard development efforts in Taiwan.In setting the 3DS-IC standards, SEMI put the needs of the manufacturing sector first, Chen says, to ensure their implementation throughout the supply chain. SEMI saw Taiwan’s development of 3D IC standards, coupled with its manufacturing prowess, as key to securing the region’s place in the global 3D IC market.Wide Range of Industries Prosper With SEMI StandardsOf course the influence of SEMI Standards extends well beyond 3D IC to include protocols for hardware and software communication, traceability, compound semiconductors, facilities, MEMS (micro-electromechanical systems), metrics, silicon wafers, carriers and automation systems. The standards are used in a broad range of manufacturing segments including panel display, photovoltaic, PCB and high brightness LED.As recently as last February, SEMI Taiwan formed a PCBECI (PCB equipment communication interface) equipment networking pilot team to build a solid foundation for smart PCB manufacturing in the region. The team combined the SECS (SEMI equipment communication standard) and GEM (generic equipment model) interfaces to create the PCBECI protocol.Security Standards Vital in Smart ManufacturingWith smart manufacturing’s aim to drive new efficiencies comes growing security concerns in the global microelectronics industry. Improving communication within a manufacturing facility, and between that facility and trusted suppliers or partners, is central to the success of smart manufacturing. To improve communications, the conduits for the flow of information must first be secure. SEMI Taiwan is answering this critical need by creating a task force to promote information security standards – an effort that will give Taiwan a powerful voice in the development of global standards.For Taiwan, SEMI Standards is the backbone of a thriving semiconductor manufacturing industry. As many as 25 SEMI Standards are cited in a purchase order for a piece of semiconductor processing equipment, and standards helped propel Taiwan’s rise as global semiconductor manufacturing power. The region has produced a staggering 2.2 billion wafers and 1.8 trillion IC devices.Taiwan on Track to Become World’s Largest Equipment MarketTaiwan’s semiconductor industry continues to gather strength. According to the SEMI 2019 Mid-Year Total Equipment Forecast, Taiwan will dethrone Korea as the largest equipment market and lead the world with 21.1 percent growth this year.Since Wendy Chen started her work on standards in 2010, SEMI has published about 200 protocols. As part of the SEMI Taiwan Test Committee, she joined the celebration for another milestone – the publication of the 1,000th SEMI International Standard in July. The corks of the champagne bottles popped nearly a half century after SEMI began developing standards to accelerate innovation and help power what today is the $2 trillion global electronics industry.And with Taiwan’s rise to the top of equipment market, it has good reason to cheer too. Emmy Yi is a marketing specialist at SEMI Taiwan.

Post-Conference Report: SEMI Heterogeneous Integration SummitDemand for high-performance computing (HPC) chips is exploding. These super-speedy chips are critical for data centers and cloud computing infrastructures to support new performance-hungry technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and 5G. The challenge is for the devices and their multi-core architectures to couple high bandwidth density with low latency and high energy efficiency. Heterogenous integration offers a potential answer as an advanced packaging technology designed to meet these skyrocketing performance demands on HPC chips and open the door to a whole new world of 3D integrated circuits (ICs).So important are 3D ICs that Intel and TSMC representatives speaking at the recent Heterogeneous Integration Summit hosted by SEMI Taiwan in Taipei declared that the packaging technology will all but dictate the future of the industry. All told, 12 speakers from government, academia and a broad range of leading international companies from sectors including advanced packaging, design, manufacturing, silicon photonics, equipment and materials shared forward-looking strategies, the latest technologies and potential heterogeneous integration market opportunities. Koushik Banerjee, vice president, TMG, Assembly, and Test Technology Integration, at Intel pointed out that using heterogeneous integration for a single SiP (system-in-package) will deliver what the industry has long wanted by enabling multiple process nodes, more diverse silicon IP (intellectual property) and chip functionality, and chips that pair low energy with high frequency. Intel plans to announce its first Forveros 3D packaging product combining a 10nm HPC chiplet with a low-energy 22nm base die and stacked with memory on top. When asked about the future of advanced packaging technology, Banerjee said it will be very much about the combination of Foveros and its very own Embedded Multi-Die Interconnect Bridge (EMIB).For its part, TSMC, will continue to upgrade its CoWoS (Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate), InFO (Integrated Fan-out) and other 2.5D IC production solutions while developing 3D chip stacking technology such as SoIC and WoW (wafer-on-wafer). TSMC is ushering in a new age of 3D IC packaging, said Marvin Liao, Vice President, Backend Technology and Service Division, at TSMC. The company’s SoIC is based on Chip-on-Wafer concept, with the flexibility to support one-to-many or different process nodes, whereas its WoW integrates two wafers with solid yields that could be used for products of the same size or manufactured with mature process technology.Speakers also included representatives from ATOTECH, Lam Research, SPIL, Sigurd, Cadence, Grand Process Technology, ITRI (Industrial Technology Research Institute), Industrial Development Bureau, and Lee San-Liang, Distinguished Professor, Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering at National Taiwan University of Science and Technology all shared their perspectives on equipment, materials, and testing and how different industry value chains might contribute to the development of heterogeneous integration technology.Expected to be a key driver of the next wave of semiconductors, heterogeneous integration and related technologies – including 3D IC, FOWLP (Fan-out wafer-level packaging) / FOPLP (Fan-out panel-level packaging), silicon photonics, Micro LED, compound semiconductor, automated optical inspection and SLT (system level testing) – will be a key focus at SEMICON Taiwan 2019, September 18 to 20 in Taipei. The Heterogeneous Integration Innovation Zone – along with featured international programs such as SiP Global Summit, Strategic Materials Conference, the Smart Data Summit and the Smart Automotive Summit – will gather key industry players to reveal the latest technology breakthroughs and market trends.Emmy Yi is a senior marketing specialist at SEMI Taiwan.

New SEMI Taiwan Testing Committee to strengthen the last line of defense to ensure the reliability of advanced semiconductor applications.Mobile, high-performance computing (HPC), automotive, and IoT – the four future growth drivers of semiconductor industry, plus the additional boost from artificial intelligence (AI) and 5G – will spur exponential demand for multi-function and high-performance chips. Today, a 3D IC semiconductor structure is beginning to integrate multiple chips to extend functionality and performance, making heterogeneous integration an irreversible trend. As the number of chips integrated in a single package increases, the structural complexity also rises. Not only will this make identifying chip defects harder, but the compatibility and interconnection between components will also introduce uncertainties that can undermine the reliability of the final ICs. Add to these challenges the need for tight cost control and a faster time to market, and it’s clear that semiconductor testing requires disruptive, innovative change. Traditional final-product testing focusing on finished components is now giving way to wafer- and system-level testing.In addition, the traditional notion of design for testing, an approach that enhances testing controllability and observability, is now coupled with the imperative to test for design, which emphasizes drawing analytics insights from collected test data to help reduce design errors and shorten development cycles. Going forward, the relationship among design, manufacturing, packaging, and testing will no longer be un-directional. Instead, it will be a cycle of continuous improvement.This paradigm shift in semiconductor testing, however, will also create a need for new industry standards and regulations, elevate visibility and security levels for shared data, require the optimization of testing time and costs, and lead to a shortage of testing professionals. Solving all these issues will require a joint effort by the industry and academia. "With leading technologies and $4.7 billion in market value, Taiwan still holds the top spot in global semiconductor testing market," said Terry Tsao, President of SEMI Taiwan. "When testing extends beyond the manufacturing process, it can play a critical role in ensuring quality throughout the entire life cycle from design and manufacturing to system integration while maintaining effective controls on development costs and schedules. Taiwan's semiconductor industry is in dire need of a common testing platform to enable the cross-disciplinary collaboration necessary for technical breakthroughs."The SEMI Taiwan Testing Committee was formed to meet that need, gathering testing experts and academics from MediaTek, Intel, NXP Semiconductors, TSMC, UMC, ASE Technology, SPIL, KYEC, Teradyne, Advantest, FormFactor, MJC, Synopsys, Cadence, Mentor, and National Tsing Hua University to collaborate in building a complete testing ecosystem. The committee addresses common technical challenges faced by the industry and cultivates next-generation testing professionals to enable Taiwan to maintain its global leadership in semiconductor testing.The SEMI Taiwan Testing Platform spans communities, expositions, programs, events, networking, business matching, advocacy, and market and technology insights. For more information about the SEMI Taiwan Testing platform, please contact Elaine Lee ([email protected]) or Ana Li ([email protected]). Emmy Yi is a marketing specialist at SEMI Taiwan.