• Insure all interested parties know which standards to have.
• Identify issues that may prevent a review of these standards prior to the March 24 meeting.
• Identify any high level issues regarding the selected standards (mainly regarding applicability).
• Develop an agenda for the March 24 meeting.

Attendees:

• Len Van Eck - LTXC
• Mark Roos – Roos Instruments
• Joel Taylor - Verigy
• Edward Smith – Salvador
• Bill Fritzsche - LTXC
• Andrew Gilligan – LTXC
• Steve Ledford – Verigy
• Michael Lyman – Optimal Test
• Don Harman
• Andy Aagaard – Intel (cannot attend Mar 24 – alterative possible)
• Sergio Perez
• Velencia De La Vega - Intel

Regarding Agenda Item 1 - Insure all interested parties know which standards to have
- Need at a minimum

Regarding Agenda Item 2- Identify issues that may prevent a review of these standards prior to the March 24 meeting;

• Everyone that submitted a TFOF form should have received an email from
  “SEMIViews Support”. This will contain your user name and initial password.
  Once logged in, you can change the password if you wish. You should have access to
  the SEMI standards that were discussed in this meeting.
• Access to SEMIViews is read-only. We do not have access rights to download and save
  the documents.
• Please contact Paul Trio (ptrio@semi.org) or Len Van Eck (len_vaneck@ltxc.com)
  for the TFOF form.

Regarding Agenda Item 3 - Identify any high level issues regarding the selected standards (mainly regarding applicability)

• Joel Taylor suggested IPC2501 – web based exchange (instead of E5).
  After meeting research by Mark Roos - It appears that SEMI E128-0706 covers this topic.
• Suggested adding E142 – Wafer mapping
• Suggested ITU X.891 – binary XML formatting – replace formatting level, not transport layer
• STDF – for datalog
  • Use as a starting point
  • Example of how datalog can be supported
  • STDF working group being formed (same as this group)
    

Develop an agenda for the March 24 meeting

• Prior to the meeting, an information packet will be distributed to the group. At a minimum, it will be posted on the SEMI CAST website for everyone to view.
• Length of the meeting – generally agreed that it will take a full day.
• Suggested agenda:
  • Call to Order
  • Problem Statement
    • If we make these changes, what problem do we solve?
    • Discussion on use cases – examples
  • Review and agree on topology
    • Based on drawing from December meeting
  • Discuss alternate specifications
    • Ramifications on recommended specs